INKA BB versteht sich als ein Innovationsnetzwerk aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, das Veränderungen aktiv gestaltet. Als Vorbild und Partner will es Ergebnisse verbreiten und Lernprozesse initiieren. Hierfür bündeln wir die in der Region vorhandenen Kompetenzen von Forschungseinrichtungen, öffentlicher Verwaltung, Wirtschaftsunternehmen und Verbänden. Das Netzwerk arbeitet in Brandenburg mit einem landesweiten Fokus. Standort- und betriebsbezogene Maßnahmen sind vorwiegend in den Regionen Lausitz-Spreewald und Uckermark-Barnim sowie in der Metropole Berlin angesiedelt.
INKA BB sees itself as an innovation network encompassing academia and business practice that brings about change proactively. As a role model and partner, the network wishes to disseminate findings and initiate learning processes. To achieve this, we combine the region’s existing expertise of research institutions, public administrations, business enterprises and associations. The network operates in Brandenburg with a federal state-wide focus. Most site- and company-related measures are undertaken in the regions of Lausitz-Spreewald and Uckermark-Barnim, as well as in the metropolis of Berlin.
INKA BB versteht sich als ein Innovationsnetzwerk aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, das Veränderungen aktiv gestaltet. Als Vorbild und Partner will es Ergebnisse verbreiten und Lernprozesse initiieren. Hierfür bündeln wir die in der Region vorhandenen Kompetenzen von Forschungseinrichtungen, öffentlicher Verwaltung, Wirtschaftsunternehmen und Verbänden. Das Netzwerk arbeitet in Brandenburg mit einem landesweiten Fokus. Standort- und betriebsbezogene Maßnahmen sind vorwiegend in den Regionen Lausitz-Spreewald und Uckermark-Barnim sowie in der Metropole Berlin angesiedelt.
Based on concepts for innovation processes and co-production of knowledge, approaches are investigated that address the urgent and complex problems related to climate change, because especially the participation of, and close collaboration with, practice partners is needed. The paper presents the agricultural knowledge management approach in the organic agriculture module of the R&D project INKA BB (Innovation Network for Climate Change Adaptation Brandenburg Berlin) in north-eastern Germany (Knierim et al. 2009). The methodology for the science-practice collaboration follows an action research approach that supports the communication and cooperation of researchers and practitioners. The framework is the action research cycle with iterative stages of planning, action, and reflection. The organic agriculture module, which addresses individual research questions on several farms, is presented as a good practice example for close transdisciplinary network cooperation. The workshop contribution will provide reflections on the innovation development process over two project years.
Impacts of climate change on agriculture have been predominantly analyzed by using biophysical and crop specific model applications. Vulnerability assessments which identify the vulnerability of regions with their farming systems are urgently required, because agricultural adaptations to climate change are related to regional specifics, and therefore research has to consider the regional level. Therefore sector- and system-specific approaches have to be developed. This paper presents the methodology of a vulnerability assessment for organic farming systems in the Brandenburg Region, which considers regional-specific climatic impact, as well as the regional-specific adaptive capacity. In this region, the cultivation and management of legume-grass swards have a key position, especially the climate change impact on legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation and nitrogen mineralization. Adaptation strategies of crop production systems include reduced soil tillage, which plays an important role also in organic farming systems (reducing soil erosion, improving water infiltration, reducing evaporation and improving soil structure, control of N-dynamics) are developed and tested by means of an action research approach.
“Adaptation to climate change” as a new field of knowledge challenges agricultural and horticultural (vocational) education and extension. Farmers and horticulturists are confronted with vague scientific findings at best. A broad variety of global climate scenarios is “projected” onto regions and exact predictions are usually not possible. Often, personal observations and experiences seem to contradict scientific assertions. Under this condition farmers and policy makers must decide about future land use.
What does this imply for capacity building? How to transform insecurity into concrete educational measures and programs?
The authors discuss their first experiences within a German R&D network (INKA BB) in which they develop capacity building programs. Two examples from urban agriculture / urban gardening will be used as case studies. Strengths and weaknesses of the development processes and their management will be discussed.
Since the topic is complex and adaptation is a continuous activity, learning in connection with climate change adaptation ideally begins on elementary level, continues in higher and vocational training, and does not end with extension. In other words: “learning chains” must be developed which enable life-long learning in formal, non-formal and informal learning environments.
Competencies are needed beyond classical technological and economic skills. Problem solving - from problem perception, analysis, generation of alternative solutions, to implementation and evaluation - with a key competence in critical analysis and reflection of contemporary research findings - gain in importance.
In INKA BB, participation is seen as axiomatic. As a consequence, an action-oriented, participatory approach has been chosen which enables mutual learning among partners from research, formal and informal, elementary, higher and vocational education.
A crucial point is the question of “Who could be the bridge between science and the educational practitioner?” In INKA BB, a specific working group (the subproject on “Knowledge Management and Transfer”) facilitates the development processes and therefore plays a liaison role between theory and practice. In the long-run, sustainable ownership of this process must be achieved. A combination of network building, mutual learning in permanent work groups, provision of technical trainings, and joint planning, testing, monitoring and evaluation is seen as a precondition.
Der Schutz aller natürlichen biotischen und abiotischen Güter und Ressourcen ist unerlässlicher Bestandteil einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung in Brandenburg. In Wahrnehmung dieser gesellschaftlichen Querschnittsaufgabe müssen Naturschützer mit anthropogenen und natürlichen Veränderungen sowie deren Wechselwirkungen umgehen. Der Klimawandel beeinflusst zusehends die Funktionstüchtigkeit der biologischen Vielfalt. Er hat das Potenzial, die bisherigen Gefährdungen der Arten und Ökosysteme deutlich zu verstärken.
Welche Optionen gibt es für ein klimawandelangepasstes Naturschutz-Handeln?
Ausgewählte Antworten auf diese Frage gibt der vorliegende Band. Er stellt zwei neu entwickelte Instrumente für angepasste Planungsverfahren vor: eine Methode der standortbezogenen Risikoabschätzung zur Priorisierung von Handlungsräumen und -schwerpunkten, sowie MARISCO - eine Methode zur Anwendung eines adaptiven Risiko-Managements. Beide Ansätze wurden im Rahmen des Projektes mit Praxispartner erprobt. Nach einer 2012 erschienenen Analyse strategischer Grundlagen ist dies der zweite Band einer dreiteiligen Serie zur regionalen Anpassung des Naturschutzmanagements an den Klimawandel.
Das Innovationsnetzwerk Klimaanpassung Brandenburg Berlin stellt sich vor
(2012)
